Buying guide 6 min
How to evaluate an architectural AI workflow
A practical checklist for comparing inputs, methods, deliverables, limitations, and review obligations before you buy.
Read guideAgent skillMedium riskVersion 2.1.0New
Drawing Set Coordination Review
Review a PDF drawing set and produce a categorized, evidence-linked multidisciplinary coordination register.
Required inputs
- Drawing set · required
PDF - Consultant responsibility list · required
DOCX, XLSX, PDF - Previous issue register · optional
XLSX, CSV
Compatibility
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Adobe Acrobat
- Bluebeam
Last tested Jun 2026
Review boundary
Project architect and discipline leads validate issue accuracy, ownership, and severity.
01
Input → method → output
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
How to install
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into ChatGPT, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in PDF.
SAMPLE INPUT
Drawing set + Consultant responsibility list + Previous issue register
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
XLSX issue register + Markdown executive summary
Redacted output preview
Coordination issue register
60% DD set · Coordination pass 02
- High priority
- 4
- Open coordination
- 11
- Missing information
- 8
A-421 / M-302
Ceiling bulkhead conflicts with supply route at meeting room 2.14; confirm routing owner.
Review note
Fire-rating continuity is unclear at three service penetrations; code consultant review required.
27 candidate issues · 19 accepted after review · 6 disciplines represented
02
What it does
A repeatable drawing-set review skill for finding coordination gaps, incomplete information, cross-discipline conflicts, and documentation inconsistencies. Findings are normalized into an issue register with evidence, owner, severity, and recommended next action.
A categorized, evidence-linked issue register with discipline owner, severity, and next action.
Designed for
- Milestone drawing review
- Consultant coordination
- QA handover
- Issue-register normalization
03
Included files + delivery
README.mdMarkdownSetup, use, and professional boundary
SKILL.mdMarkdownPrimary workflow entry point
variables.jsonJSONInputs and output configuration
sample-input.mdMarkdownRepresentative input structure
sample-output.mdMarkdownRepresentative output structure
manifest.jsonJSONPackage contract and permissions
qa-report.jsonJSONValidation and review record
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Workflow steps
- 01
Set review scope
Declare milestone, disciplines, issue taxonomy, exclusions, and severity rules.
- 02
Index the set
Build a sheet, revision, and discipline map before reviewing content.
- 03
Run review passes
Check completeness, internal consistency, cross-discipline coordination, and explicit risks.
- 04
Validate the register
Deduplicate, assign owners, confirm evidence, and accept or reject every candidate issue.
05
Limitations + professional safety
Medium risk · human review required
Project architect and discipline leads validate issue accuracy, ownership, and severity.
Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction-neutral; drawing standards and issue policy supplied by buyer
Known limitations
- Does not inspect native BIM geometry
- Cannot determine constructability from missing information
- Issue severity must be calibrated to office policy
06
Security + quality
Declared permissions
- Local file read for selected PDFs
- Local file write for the output register
- No shell or unrestricted network access
Completion checks
- Every issue references a sheet or view
- Duplicates are consolidated
- Observations and recommendations remain separate
Package structure reviewedVersion 2.1.0Tested Jun 2026
07
Install + use
01
Download
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Read
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Prepare
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Run + review
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
Reviews + trust
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Verified purchase requiredVersion-specificCreator response supported
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Creator
Section Nine
archiPrompt StudioArchitecture and BIM coordination · 16 years · Melbourne, Australia
Architects and BIM coordinators packaging repeatable quality-control methods for project teams.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
FAQ + support + changelog
Does it review Revit files directly?
PDF is supported directly. Native model review requires a separate exported issue schedule.
Can it replace a coordination meeting?
No. It is a structured first-pass assistant; the project team owns every final issue and coordination decision.
Support
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
Latest changelog
v2.1 added discipline ownership and issue-severity calibration examples.
Updated Jul 20, 2026
Jurisdiction-neutral; drawing standards and issue policy supplied by buyer
Related guidance
Evaluate the method before you use it.
Read the relevant evidence and professional-boundary guidance for this workflow and its task area.
Workflow guide 5 min
What makes a drawing coordination review auditable?
The fields and review habits that turn a list of drawing comments into a coordination record another team member can verify.
Read guideRelated workflows
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Shared project phase · Design developmentPurchase the workflow, add its file to Claude, enter a sample instruction, and review the generated Revit deliverable.
BIM + data operations Agent skill
BIM Model QA Checklist
Check BIM schedule exports against office rules and produce a transparent issue and exception register.
- Output
- Model QA register
- Tested
- Revit schedule export
- Solibri BCF export
- Microsoft Excel
- +1
- Price
- CA$56
Medium risk New
Helpful? 0 0
Shared project phase · Design developmentPurchase the workflow, add its file to Claude, enter a sample instruction, and review the generated Microsoft Excel deliverable.
Codes + accessibility Workflow
Accessibility Review Assistant
Structure a first-pass accessibility review with cited evidence, confidence, gaps, and mandatory professional disposition.
- Output
- Review register
- Tested
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Adobe Acrobat
- +1
- Price
- CA$52
High risk New
Helpful? 0 0
Shared project phase · Design developmentPurchase the workflow, add its file to Claude, enter a sample instruction, and review the generated PDF deliverable.
Specifications + material research Workflow
Outline Specification Drafter
Draft a source-linked outline specification with explicit assumptions, gaps, and qualified-review flags.
- Output
- Outline specification
- Tested
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Microsoft Word
- +1
- Price
- CA$44
High risk New
Helpful? 0 0