Review a PDF drawing set and produce a categorized, evidence-linked multidisciplinary coordination register.
Architecture · BIM · Engineering coordination
Milestone drawing review
A categorized, evidence-linked issue register with discipline owner, severity, and next action.
XLSX issue register + Markdown executive summary
Compatibility tested Jun 2026
Project architect and discipline leads validate issue accuracy, ownership, and severity.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the Prompt, add its file to ChatGPT, enter your project-specific instruction, and review the result in PDF.
SAMPLE INPUT
Drawing set + Consultant responsibility list + Previous issue register
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
XLSX issue register + Markdown executive summary
Redacted output preview
60% DD set · Coordination pass 02
Ceiling bulkhead conflicts with supply route at meeting room 2.14; confirm routing owner.
Fire-rating continuity is unclear at three service penetrations; code consultant review required.
27 candidate issues · 19 accepted after review · 6 disciplines represented
02
A repeatable drawing-set review skill for finding coordination gaps, incomplete information, cross-discipline conflicts, and documentation inconsistencies. Findings are normalized into an issue register with evidence, owner, severity, and recommended next action.
A categorized, evidence-linked issue register with discipline owner, severity, and next action.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Declare milestone, disciplines, issue taxonomy, exclusions, and severity rules.
Build a sheet, revision, and discipline map before reviewing content.
Check completeness, internal consistency, cross-discipline coordination, and explicit risks.
Deduplicate, assign owners, confirm evidence, and accept or reject every candidate issue.
05
Project architect and discipline leads validate issue accuracy, ownership, and severity.
Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction-neutral; drawing standards and issue policy supplied by buyer
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named Prompt entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Architecture and BIM coordination · 16 years · Melbourne, Australia
Architects and BIM coordinators packaging repeatable quality-control methods for project teams.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
PDF is supported directly. Native model review requires a separate exported issue schedule.
No. It is a structured first-pass assistant; the project team owns every final issue and coordination decision.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v2.1 added discipline ownership and issue-severity calibration examples.
Related guidance
Read the relevant evidence and professional-boundary guidance for this Prompt and its task area.
Install Codex CLI on Windows, sign in with ChatGPT, open an empty practice folder, and check your first safe session—without using live AEC files.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideInstall Codex CLI on a Mac, sign in with ChatGPT, open an empty practice folder, and check your first safe session—without using live AEC files.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideBeginner-friendly instructions for architects: install a curated skill in Codex CLI, confirm it appears, and fix the most common first-run problem.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideFind every Claude Code skill location, choose personal or project scope, create a safe AEC SKILL.md, verify it, fix failures, and remove it cleanly.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideA practical introduction to architecture prompts, downloadable skills, and MCP integrations for architects, designers, contractors, engineers, developers, marketers, and students using major AI and design tools.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideA source-led QA method for reviewing AI-generated drawing, model, schedule, specification, and coordination outputs before project use.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read articleA practical boundary for choosing appropriate architecture AI tasks, protecting information, retaining human responsibility, and documenting review.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read articleA practical checklist for comparing architecture AI Prompts by deliverable, inputs, method, compatibility, evidence, limitations, and review responsibility.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideThe fields and review habits that turn drawing comments into a coordination record another team member can locate, understand, and verify.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideSelected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
BIM + data operations Agent skill
Check BIM schedule exports against office rules and produce a transparent issue and exception register.
Codes + accessibility Prompt package
Structure a first-pass accessibility review with cited evidence, confidence, gaps, and mandatory professional disposition.
Specifications + material research Prompt package
Draft a source-linked outline specification with explicit assumptions, gaps, and qualified-review flags.