Structure a first-pass accessibility review with cited evidence, confidence, gaps, and mandatory professional disposition.
Last tested Jun 2026
Qualified accessibility consultant or code professional verifies every observation and cited requirement.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into Claude, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in Microsoft Excel.
SAMPLE INPUT
Drawing set + Applicable accessibility source + Project and occupancy brief
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
XLSX review register + Markdown escalation brief
Redacted output preview
Public library · 50% design development
Clear opening width is not dimensioned on A-112; do not infer compliance from the door tag.
Confirm assisted-listening scope and assembly-space classification with the accessibility consultant.
15 candidate observations · 7 evidence gaps · qualified review mandatory
02
A high-risk review assistant that structures first-pass accessibility observations around supplied drawings and authoritative sources. Every candidate issue requires evidence, a source citation, confidence, and explicit professional disposition.
A source-linked register of candidate observations, evidence gaps, confidence, and professional disposition.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Record jurisdiction, source version, project use, review phase, and professional reviewer.
Index drawings and dimensions; missing evidence cannot become a pass or fail.
Create neutral observations with source citations, confidence, and required evidence.
Reviewer accepts, revises, rejects, or escalates every observation.
05
Qualified accessibility consultant or code professional verifies every observation and cited requirement.
Jurisdiction: Buyer must supply and declare the applicable jurisdiction and source version
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Technical architecture studio · 18 years · Vancouver, Canada
Technical architecture team building review systems for documentation, accessibility, and construction administration.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
No. It produces candidate observations for a qualified accessibility professional to verify.
Only when the buyer supplies the applicable source documents and section references.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.2 added evidence confidence and exception-condition prompts.
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Documentation + QA Agent skill
Review a PDF drawing set and produce a categorized, evidence-linked multidisciplinary coordination register.
Specifications + material research Workflow
Draft a source-linked outline specification with explicit assumptions, gaps, and qualified-review flags.
BIM + data operations Agent skill
Check BIM schedule exports against office rules and produce a transparent issue and exception register.