Draft a source-linked outline specification with explicit assumptions, gaps, and qualified-review flags.
Last tested Jun 2026
Qualified architect or specification writer verifies products, standards, performance, coordination, and contractual language.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into Claude, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in PDF.
SAMPLE INPUT
Design narrative + Material and system schedule + Office specification template
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
DOCX outline specification + XLSX assumption log
Redacted output preview
Library renovation · Design development
Ventilated rainscreen intent recorded; support system, fire barriers, and warranty basis remain unconfirmed.
Do not issue acoustic target for meeting rooms until the consultant requirement is confirmed.
22 work sections · 17 assumptions · 8 critical review flags
02
A cautious outline-specification workflow that organizes design information by system, performance intent, product assumption, evidence, and review owner. Missing decisions remain visible and potentially contractual language is never invented silently.
An outline specification tied to source information, with assumptions and critical review flags separated.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Map narratives, schedules, drawings, and decisions to specification systems.
State only supported requirements and label every assumption.
Check scope boundaries, cross-references, products, and missing consultant input.
Produce the outline and an owner-based critical assumption log.
05
Qualified architect or specification writer verifies products, standards, performance, coordination, and contractual language.
Jurisdiction: Buyer supplies applicable standards and specification system
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Technical architecture studio · 18 years · Vancouver, Canada
Technical architecture team building review systems for documentation, accessibility, and construction administration.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
No. It drafts an outline for specifier review and marks every unsupported technical assumption.
Yes. A mapping table can be supplied and the output template adjusted to office sections.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.3 added assumption severity and cross-reference checks.
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Codes + accessibility Workflow
Structure a first-pass accessibility review with cited evidence, confidence, gaps, and mandatory professional disposition.
Design + visualization Prompt system
Generate desks, meeting settings, task chairs, and storage as consistent office-planning vector symbols.
Design + visualization Prompt system
Create palms, broad-leaf plants, cacti, agaves, and arid shrubs with consistent graphic conventions.
