Turn a planning brief and municipal sources into a cited zoning constraints memo with explicit review flags.
Architecture · Planning
Early site due diligence
A cited memo distinguishing confirmed controls, assumptions, conflicts, and questions for qualified review.
DOCX or Markdown memo + CSV source register
Compatibility tested Jun 2026
Architect or qualified planning professional must verify every cited control before client use.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the Prompt, add its file to Claude, enter your project-specific instruction, and review the result in PDF.
SAMPLE INPUT
Project and site brief + Municipal planning sources + Survey or site plan
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
DOCX or Markdown memo + CSV source register
Redacted output preview
Site 14A · Feasibility stage
Maximum height recorded as 14.0 m; angular-plane applicability requires confirmation.
Confirm heritage overlay boundary and whether the rear lane changes parking access requirements.
8 municipal sources cited · 3 unresolved questions · professional review required
02
A source-first due-diligence workflow for turning a site brief and official municipal material into a concise, auditable zoning constraints memo. It separates facts from interpretation, keeps citations attached to each finding, and ends with explicit questions for the project team.
A cited memo distinguishing confirmed controls, assumptions, conflicts, and questions for qualified review.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Capture site, proposal, phase, jurisdiction, and decisions the memo must support.
Classify supplied sources by authority, date, geography, and confidence.
Record controls with citations and surface contradictions without guessing.
Generate the memo, assumptions, flags, and a qualified-review checklist.
05
Architect or qualified planning professional must verify every cited control before client use.
Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction declared by buyer; example is Ontario, Canada
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named Prompt entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Architectural research practice · 12 years · London, UK
Architect-led research practice focused on early due diligence, planning evidence, and site decision records.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
No. It organizes cited research for qualified review and never claims planning approval or legal interpretation.
Yes. The source register separates confirmed controls, inferred constraints, and unanswered questions.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.2 added source-confidence labels and a municipal-link verification pass.
Related guidance
Read the relevant evidence and professional-boundary guidance for this Prompt and its task area.
How to use AI to organize planning evidence while keeping citations, uncertainty, source dates, and professional verification visible.
By Stefan Miller · Updated Aug 2026
Read guideSelected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Research + precedents Prompt
Build a question-led precedent brief with comparable evidence, citations, and project-transfer notes.
Procurement + consultant comparison Template
Normalize consultant proposals into a comparable scope, fee, exclusion, and clarification matrix.
Site + climate Template
Turn climate and context evidence into a traceable site-opportunity map brief and diagram system.