Normalize consultant proposals into a comparable scope, fee, exclusion, and clarification matrix.
Last tested May 2026
Project lead verifies commercial interpretation, exclusions, and final recommendation.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into Claude, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in Microsoft Excel.
SAMPLE INPUT
Consultant proposals + Issued RFP or scope + Evaluation criteria
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
XLSX matrix + DOCX recommendation brief
Redacted output preview
Structural engineer appointment · RFP 24-017
Temporary works review is included by Team B, excluded by Team A, and ambiguous in Team C.
Confirm whether construction-stage site attendance is capped or included as required.
3 proposals compared · 18 scope lines · 9 clarifications
02
A proposal-comparison bundle that maps differently structured consultant submissions against one normalized scope. It preserves original language, exposes inclusions and exclusions, and creates a clarification log rather than hiding uncertainty in a score.
A normalized comparison matrix preserving inclusions, exclusions, assumptions, fees, and clarification questions.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Convert the issued RFP and evaluation criteria into normalized scope lines.
Map inclusions, exclusions, assumptions, programme, team, and fees without paraphrasing away meaning.
Distinguish confirmed differences from ambiguous or missing proposal information.
Generate clarification questions and a neutral recommendation structure.
05
Project lead verifies commercial interpretation, exclusions, and final recommendation.
Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction-neutral; procurement rules supplied by buyer
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Architecture and design strategy · 11 years · New York, USA
Design strategy practice working across precedents, competitions, narratives, procurement, and practice knowledge.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
Yes. The normalization schema keeps proposal language alongside the mapped scope item and confidence score.
No. It highlights commercial differences but does not make a procurement or legal decision.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.0 initial beta catalogue release.
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Site + climate Template bundle
Turn climate and context evidence into a traceable site-opportunity map brief and diagram system.
Client brief + programming Workflow
Convert a client brief, room data, and stakeholder notes into a traceable accommodation programme.
Research + precedents Prompt system
Build a question-led precedent brief with comparable evidence, citations, and project-transfer notes.