Convert an RFI and contract evidence into a controlled response draft with change and action flags.
Last tested May 2026
Contract administrator reviews contractual meaning, design intent, cost, time, and final instruction.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into Claude, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in PDF.
SAMPLE INPUT
RFI and attachments + Relevant contract documents + Prior correspondence
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
DOCX response draft + XLSX action register
Redacted output preview
RFI-087 · Stair 02 head detail
Provide the fire-stopping assembly shown in A-612 detail 7; coordinate the revised support angle with structural.
Confirm whether the support-angle revision affects the tendered structural scope or programme.
4 source references · 2 open actions · potential change flagged
02
A controlled construction-administration workflow for converting an RFI and relevant contract evidence into a concise response draft. It separates facts, interpretation, missing information, potential change, and required action before the contract administrator decides what to issue.
A source-linked response draft separating answer, assumptions, change signals, and follow-up actions.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Identify the question, requested decision, urgency, disciplines, and possible change.
Collect only current relevant drawings, specifications, addenda, and prior responses.
Separate direct answer, rationale, assumptions, missing information, and required coordination.
Check scope, cost, schedule, liability, and authority before any response is issued.
05
Contract administrator reviews contractual meaning, design intent, cost, time, and final instruction.
Jurisdiction: Contract form and jurisdiction supplied by buyer
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09
Technical architecture studio · 18 years · Vancouver, Canada
Technical architecture team building review systems for documentation, accessibility, and construction administration.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
No. It prepares a source-linked draft for the contract administrator to review and issue.
The workflow stops and produces a missing-information request rather than inventing an instruction.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.0 initial beta catalogue release.
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Specifications + material research Workflow
Draft a source-linked outline specification with explicit assumptions, gaps, and qualified-review flags.
Competitions + narratives Prompt system
Turn project facts into a competition narrative, board sequence, diagram brief, and claim-evidence map.
Practice operations Template bundle
Turn project closeout interviews into an evidence-aware lessons brief and action register.