Research + precedents Prompt system
Precedent Research Brief
Build a question-led precedent brief with comparable evidence, citations, and project-transfer notes.
- Output
- Research brief
- Tested
- Perplexity
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- +1
- Price
- CA$19
Turn project facts into a competition narrative, board sequence, diagram brief, and claim-evidence map.
Last tested Jun 2026
Design lead verifies every project claim, authorship statement, metric, and competition requirement.
01
The public process and a redacted example are visible before purchase.
Purchase the workflow, drop its file into ChatGPT, add your project-specific instruction, and review the result in Adobe InDesign.
SAMPLE INPUT
Competition brief + Project facts and design principles + Submission requirements
PROCESS PREVIEW
4 controlled steps with quality checks
EXPECTED OUTPUT
DOCX narrative + board outline + XLSX evidence map
Redacted output preview
Civic threshold competition · Narrative v04
The project turns a defensive service edge into a shared civic room linking transit, market, and river.
Show the three public routes as one continuous ground figure before introducing programme.
7 core claims · 6 board moments · 2 evidence gaps
02
A claim-first constructor for turning project facts and a competition brief into a coherent narrative, board sequence, and diagram brief. It keeps evidence attached to each claim and adapts the same story to jury text, board copy, and presentation notes.
A concise competition story with board sequence, diagram prompts, and evidence-linked claims.
03
Delivered as a versioned ZIP package. After verified payment, the exact purchased version is available through the buyer's private Library.
04
Extract evaluation criteria, required content, limits, and disqualifying conditions.
Connect project facts, design moves, outcomes, and available evidence.
Sequence proposition, context, method, experience, performance, and conclusion.
Create jury narrative, board copy, captions, and diagram briefs from one claim map.
05
Design lead verifies every project claim, authorship statement, metric, and competition requirement.
Jurisdiction: Not jurisdiction-dependent; competition rules supplied by buyer
06
07
01
Receive the immutable versioned ZIP package.
02
Open SKILL.md or the named workflow entry point.
03
Collect required inputs and remove sensitive data.
04
Execute in a tested tool, then complete human review.
08
No public reviews yet
Synthetic ratings and review counts are not displayed.
Public reviews are withheld until the marketplace can verify purchase entitlement and support a trustworthy, version-specific review process.
09

Architecture and design strategy · 11 years · New York, USA
Design strategy practice working across precedents, competitions, narratives, procurement, and practice knowledge.
A first-party specialization account operated and approved by archiPrompt.
View creator profile10
Yes. The structure supports short board copy, a longer jury narrative, and presentation speaking notes.
No. Unsupported claims are flagged and held out of final copy until evidence is supplied.
Email support for setup and documented compatibility issues
v1.1 added claim-evidence mapping and board-length modes.
Selected from shared project phases, disciplines, compatible tools, and adjacent deliverables—not generic popularity.
Research + precedents Prompt system
Build a question-led precedent brief with comparable evidence, citations, and project-transfer notes.
Site + climate Template bundle
Turn climate and context evidence into a traceable site-opportunity map brief and diagram system.
Design + visualization Prompt system
Generate desks, meeting settings, task chairs, and storage as consistent office-planning vector symbols.